10 Hilarious Things People Used To Believe About Iconic Animals

It’s not difficult to require the level of info we now have at our fingertips. As an example, the Mona Lisa could be described by everyone when it has never been viewed by them, thanks to TV and the World Wide Web. But imagine going back in time and attempting to describe something to somebody who’d never seen one such as a lion or an elephant.

Here are 10 instances of men and women from history mistaking well-known creatures pulled from their very own perverted imaginations, or critters for mythological beasts, strange hybrids.

10 The Cyclops Myth Began With Elephant Skulls

01

Photo credit: Emoke Denes

We seldom consider what creatures look like underneath all that fur and skin. For instance, were you aware that the elephant’s skull has an enormous hole right at the center?

It’s not difficult as people that understand what an elephant looks like, to understand the hole indicates the precise location of the elephant’s trunk, for us. But, the primeval Greeks did’t possess the luxury of the knowledge, then when they located the giant skulls of an elephant’s prehistory relative, Deinotherium giganteum, they made the only premise they could: It belonged to some giant one eyed guy.

Writer Adrienne Mayor implies that skull and the bones of the elephant that is early paved the means for the myth of the Cyclops with stories of other creatures that are mythological. It might seem ridiculous now, however an early Greek likely would’t have believed it any less credible than a giant four-legged animal having a nose the period of its own body. The truth is, when more artists in the Middle Ages were tasked with bringing on an elephant from this kind of vague description, they came up with creatures as implausible as the cyclops.

9 The Elephant Of The Speculum Humanae Salvationis

02

The Speculum Humanae Salvationis (“Mirror of Individual Redemption”) was an anonymously authored publication in the Middle Ages featuring adorable small poems according to narratives in the Bible. The novel was popular for about 200 years, and it had been republished tons of times in a number of languages from unnamed artists with artwork.

One especially popular narrative in the manuscript is the fact that of Eleazar Avaran, a soldier crushed to death by an elephant through the Maccabean Revolt of 160 B.C. Many artists took it upon themselves to draw on this heroic action, of never having never seen an elephant in their own own lives, regardless of the handicap.

Browse the various depictions that are artistic to see how badly the mark was missed by the artists. Interestingly enough, the one thing they were able to get right was the elephant’s trunk, that’s not worse in relation to the Greeks do.

8 Taxidermy Lion With A Person Who’d Never Seen A Lion

03

Photo credit: Mona Skoglund

Lions are among the very well-known big cats—there was a time at which you could see a film at your face right with no lion roaring. Go back to 1731, though, also it turned out to be a distinct narrative.

They were a peculiar, nearly mythic creature to most of the Western world even though the pictures of lions were common on coats of arms. So when King Frederik the First of Sweden sent his local taxidermist a lion, the issue had almost no idea what creature he had been requested to mount. The end result proved to be a cartoonish caricature of a lion would’t look out of place in a KISS-themed Disney film.

The storyline is perhaps apocryphal—every source that is current leads back to one site that is Swedish, leaving the complete details almost not possible to pick out.

7 The Platypus No One Considered Was Real

04
When you are aware the platypus is real, the creature continues to be nearly incredible. It’s a mammal, but it lays eggs, and it’s additionally venomous and contains a duck bill that is silly.

With all that in your mind, it’s not difficult to envision that when the creature was struck, it received a balanced quantity of incredulity from naturalists. George Shaw, one specialist extremely assaulted a platypus that was stuffed to show it was not genuine. Fashionable scissor marks are still sported by the specimen in the British Museum as an everlasting testament to guy’s disbelief.

6 The Camelopard

05

Photo credit: Chaouki Kamboua

Camelopard” (occasionally written as “camelopardalis“) is the name coined by the ancient Romans for the meek giraffe. They identified it under the false premise the creature was an unusual combination between a leopard and a camel.

It’s not clear if they considered among their mischievous gods was responsible or whether they thought the two creatures had conjugated to make a giraffe. That which we do understand is the fact that camelopards was adored by the Romans. The creature enjoyed a reputation as a gentle and peculiar animal so shy it may be guided about with simply a straightforward cord.

For believing the giraffe was associated with the camel it’s possible for you to forgive the Romans. Both creatures are big quadruped mammals with long spindly legs. The Romans for whatever reason, believed the ostrich resembled a camel. The truth is, famous Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder openly referred to the ostrich as “struthio camelus” (“camel bird“) in his works.

5 Durer’s Bulletproof Rhinoceros

06
Albrecht Durer was a 16th century German artist hailed as a star throughout Europe for his drawings—which, throughout the continent, were readily available for purchase because of the arrival of woodcut printing. Among Durer’s drawings that were more well-known is his etching of a rhinoceros, a creature Durer never laid eyes on.

The single reference Durer had for his drawing was a letter detailing the creature’s measurements as well as a sketch. Durer’s variation so turned out significantly more complex than the real thing. Everything about it’s exaggerated to the point of hilarity. By way of example, its thick, leathery skin is drawn to seem like armor plating, and its own horn seems just like a ceremonial dagger.

We do’t understand the rhino was drawn by Durer in this way, but we believe we’re all better people for having laid eyes on it.

4 The Stubby-Equipped Kangaroo

07

Photo credit: Nevill Keating Pictures

The kangaroo has symbolized Australia ever since it was seen (and shot) by naturalist Sir Joseph Banks in 1771. Banks had been aboard the HMS Endeavour on its research voyage to Australia. He understood it had to be recorded, which meant it had to be killed upon finding the kangaroo.

When the Endeavour returned to England, slain kangaroo in tow, Banks requested distinguished painter George Stubbs to paint the creature for his records. Stubbs painted amusingly stubby arms, an excessively long tail on the creature despite having an actual specimen to base on his drawing, as well as a mouselike head.

No matter how off the measurements were, Stubbs’s drawing was still considered good enough for the cover of the novel detailing the Endeavour‘s Australia excursion, cementing the creature’s standing as the chief symbol of the continent.

3The Beast Of Gevaudan

08
As we’ve mentioned before, the Middle Ages saw wolves became increasingly violent toward people because of the many (edible) corpses left behind from the Black Death. Wolves hunted for food in people, and particular arty freedoms were taken by them when the time arrived to draw on these mysterious creatures.

One especially well-known example is the Beast Of Gevaudan, a creature that allegedly terrorized the part of Gevaudan between 1764 and 1767. The creature was described as sets from a giant bipedal creature covered in spikes into a hybrid between a hyena along with a dog. It’s possible for you to forgive artists of the day for drawings such as the aforementioned picture.

But when a real gray wolf was killed by hunter Francois Antoine for the animal while hunting, artists determined that he’d actually killed an anteater that was upset.

2 The Skinny Dodo

09
The dodo is known globally, thanks to the anatomical drawings of artists like Roelant Savery despite being extinct for the last 300 years. But a dodo was seen by very few artists physically. They based their drawings on either written descriptions of the fowl, isolated parts of specimen, as well as other drawings that were wrong.

It’s resulted in two distinct renderings of the fowl: the recognizable awkward waddling dodo as well as a leaner, decidedly brutal-looking variant, like the aforementioned drawing from 17th century biologist Carolus Clusius.

No one is precisely certain which one of those characterizations is more precise. Both or either of these drawings may be hilariously incorrect.

1 The Hyena’s Magical Disappearing Penis

10

Photo credit: British Library

The hyena may well not function as the prettiest creature out there, but it’s among Africa’s more well-known and exceptional creatures, which has led to it being featured in numerous items of artwork that is historical. Nevertheless, there’s one characteristic of the hyena nobody looked able to get appropriate.

As far back as Aesop’s fables, the hyena was called a creature in a position to improve its sex. Though this belief was challenged by such revered minds as Aristotle and Pliny the Elder, it managed to be perpetuated all the way to the Middle Ages.